Legal Advice for Unfair Dismissal During Redundancy

Back

Placing employee on garden leave during redundancy process may make dismissal unfair

28th February, 2019

NEWS

In Thomas v BNP Paribas Real Estate, the EAT allowed an employee's appeal against a tribunal's finding that his dismissal was fair, notwithstanding that the tribunal had considered that the redundancy consultation process was "insensitive" and "perfunctory" especially as the employee was placed on garden leave at the start of the process.

IMPLICATIONS

Employers will want to consider whether it is reasonable to place an employee who is "at risk" of redundancy on garden leave with severe restrictions as to what he/she can and cannot do at the commencement of redundancy consultation. Whilst this may be appropriate in some instances, clearly how it is handled needs to be thought about carefully and it needs to be handled in a sensitive way.

DETAILS

The employee (who had long service - he had 41 years' service) had been informed that he was at risk of redundancy and on the same day immediately placed on garden leave and told not to contact customers or employees and his access to company systems was suspended. He was then written to and the employer used an incorrect name when addressing him (the letter was addressed "Dear Paul" when his name was Peter).

The EAT considered that the tribunal had failed to provide reasons why they considered the consultation to be reasonable given their considerable criticisms of the way the consultation was handled and as such it was not clear how they had, notwithstanding these heavy criticisms, still found the dismissal to be fair. The matter was remitted to another tribunal to consider the claim.

Quoted in the Appeal Judgment, was the Judge's comment at the sift stage of the appeal, where His Honour Judge David Richardson said:

"Speaking for myself, I find it surprising that an employer should find it necessary, if it is really at the beginning of a genuine consultation process which it has just started "at a formative stage", to put a long serving employee on gardening leave with no work, no contact with clients and no contact with fellow employees even before the consultation process has started."

This does not mean that ultimately this employee will be held to be unfairly dismissed as a result of an unreasonable consultation. That is because a fresh tribunal will now be asked to consider the claim.

COMMENT

Paula Bailey comments "In this case, there was no real explanation as to why it was considered that gardening leave was deemed necessary for such a long-serving employee and at a time when the consultation process had just started".

If you require further assistance please contact a member of the team.

© Howes Percival LLP.

Related Case Studies

Howes Percival Will and Testament

Defending a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

A leading member of the team was instructed by brothers who wished to defend a claim brought by their…

Howes Percival Countryside

Giving effect to promises – still a knotty problem for the Courts: The Supreme Court decision in Guest v Guest

The recently decided case of Guest v Guest shows the complexity of claims based on promises and how…

Howes Percival Will and Testament

Replacing an Executor

If an Executor does not advance the administration of an Estate they can be replaced – either by agreement…

Get in touch

To contact us, please fill out this form and we will get back in touch as soon as possible. Your personal data will be processed in accordance with our privacy policy which can be found here.

Please note that our offices will be closed from 1.00pm on Tuesday 24 December 2024 until 9.00am on Thursday 2 January 2025 or the holiday season.

Thank you for your enquiry. We will respond as soon as possible.

First Name

Last Name

Phone Number

Location

Email Address

Service Required

Message