Back

EAT upholds decision in in Asda equal pay case

16th October, 2017 by Matthew Potter

NEWS

The Employment Appeal Tribunal in the ASDA stores equal pay litigation has upheld the Tribunal’s decision that female claimants in retail stores can compare their pay with higher paid men in distribution centres.

DETAILS

This case concerns around 7,000 claimants working in the retail division of ASDA and has potentially significant implications for the retail sector. The claimants assert that they do work of equal value with workers in ASDA's distribution division, who are predominantly male. ASDA tried to argue that because the stores and distribution centres were in different locations, with different pay arrangements, female retail workers could not compare their pay with the men in the distribution centres. However, the Tribunal found that there were common terms and conditions across the different locations so the claims could proceed. Asda appealed but the Employment Appeal Tribunal has upheld the Tribunal’s decision.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a comparison was permitted because:

The Claimants’ and comparators’ pay, and terms and conditions, come from a “single source”;
There are common terms and conditions across the different locations; and
Comparison may be made with a hypothetical comparator where no actual comparator works at the claimant’s establishment.

The claimants must still show they carry out work of equal value to their males comparators in the distribution centres. If they succeed in that argument then ASDA will then have the opportunity to show that it has a "material factor defence" which could justify the pay disparity.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has given Asda permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

COMMENT

Matthew Potter comments: "This case has potentially significant implications for the retail sector. ASDA has been given permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal so this might not be the final word on the issue of whether the retail workers can compare themselves with their colleagues in the distribution centres".

Related Case Studies

Howes Percival Will and Testament

Defending a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

A leading member of the team was instructed by brothers who wished to defend a claim brought by their…

Howes Percival Countryside

Giving effect to promises – still a knotty problem for the Courts: The Supreme Court decision in Guest v Guest

The recently decided case of Guest v Guest shows the complexity of claims based on promises and how…

Howes Percival Will and Testament

Replacing an Executor

If an Executor does not advance the administration of an Estate they can be replaced – either by agreement…

Get in touch

To contact us, please fill out this form and we will get back in touch as soon as possible. Your personal data will be processed in accordance with our privacy policy which can be found here.

Thank you for your enquiry. We will respond as soon as possible.

First Name

Last Name

Phone Number

Location

Email Address

Service Required

Message